Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:41:42 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: perl, second shot (was: Re: first shot perl)
Message-ID: <20010821114142.D20328@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References: <3B81D599 DOT 5746 DOT BDC355F AT localhost> <3B829789 DOT 15262 DOT 11E5113 AT localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <3B829789.15262.11E5113@localhost>; from freeweb@nyckelpiga.de on Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 05:16:57PM +0200

On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 05:16:57PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>>Also, have you made any changes over the previous perl release?  In 
>>particular, it seems like people keep complaining about binmode issues.
>
>I changed nothing cygwin specific until now. Only applied all the patches
>since perl-5.6.1 was released.

So that means that this version of perl will be different from the previous
cygwin version, right?

Are the changes summarized anywhere?  Because, if not, you know that people
will ask.  :-)

cgf