Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: fixup-cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com@fixme
From: "Paul G." <pgarceau AT qwest DOT net>
Organization: New Dawn Productions
To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2001 14:16:00 -0700
Subject: Re: auto-import STATUS
Reply-to: Paul Garceau <pgarceau AT qwest DOT net>
Message-ID: <3B6C03A0.4529.3DBA22@localhost>
In-reply-to: <20010804144836.C3038@redhat.com>
References: <3B6C4156 DOT 7060404 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>; from cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu on Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 02:39:18PM -0400
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)



On 4 Aug 2001, at 14:48, the Illustrious Christopher Faylor wrote:

> On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 02:39:18PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> >So, perhaps the logic that adds thunking symbols for DATA exports in
> >DLLs needs to be re-examined, to make sure it covers these special
> >cases, esp. "static" fields of classes, and inner classes, (and
> >"static" fields OF inner classes...)
> >
> >Unfortunately, I can't really pursue this -- or anything else 
> >cygwin-related -- for the next week or so.  My laptop broke
> >(mechanical) and I have to send it back to Dell for repair.  But, I
> >have no other machine that's configured for cygwin development, so I'm
> >out of action for more than a week.  (Plus, for a different reason,
> >I'll be out of email contact Sunday/Monday.)
> >
> >Can somebody else please pursue this (and perhaps the other things
> >mentioned in the first message of this thread), now that I've managed
> >to push the initial auto-import into binutils CVS ?
> 
> So, should I hold off on releasing a new binutils for now?  Or, should I
> just mark it experimental, maybe?

	My suggestion, mark it experimental until Chuck can get back on the 
case (beta? seems it's gotten by "alpha" ok).

	Paul G.

> 
> cgf
> 

(sure is nice to have my NT4 "internet operational" again)