Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 23:34:16 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Package maintainer release procedures
Message-ID: <20010706233416.B5480@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References: <15174 DOT 18698 DOT 346785 DOT 618387 AT coyote DOT priv DOT helixdigital DOT com> <3B465441 DOT C8695619 AT t-online DOT de> <15174 DOT 22196 DOT 669125 DOT 221517 AT coyote DOT priv DOT helixdigital DOT com> <3B4661CC DOT 5080804 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <3B4661CC.5080804@ece.gatech.edu>; from cwilson@ece.gatech.edu on Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 09:11:40PM -0400

On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 09:11:40PM -0400, Charles S. Wilson wrote:
>Dario Alcocer wrote:
>
>>>>>>>"Jerome" == Jerome BENOIT <520066587150-0001 AT t-online DOT de> writes:
>>>>>>>
>> 
>>     Jerome> Bonjour:
>> 
>>     Jerome> "How do I contribute a package" link in the FAQ:
>>     Jerome> http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_4.html#SEC76
>> 
>>     Jerome> Follow the link and you shall get what you want.
>> 
>> Hmm, well, the link talks about *packaging*, not package submision :-)
>> I already read the link from the FAQ you're refering to; I've packaged
>> up the binary and source tar balls following exactly this procedure.
>> Now, what I need to know is how to *upload* (not package) these files
>> to the mirrors.
>
>
>There are two ways:
>
>1) some contributors have login accounts on sourceware and upload new 
>packages themselves.  The decision to grant such access is solely the 
>responsibility of the Red Hat management folks.

>2) I have also seen cgf specifically request that a contributor mail the 
>files to him, and he has placed them on sourceware.  (Don't just spam 
>him with unsolicited tarballs, though -- wait for a request)

Right.  If you give me a URL so that I can download your tar balls, I will
do that.

>> Regarding the anouncement, I was planning on just sending to
>> cygwin-announce (and letting the moderator approve/reject my
>> announcement) but I wanted to know what the "approved" procedure was
>> before I did anything.
>
>
>That's the typical method -- just send your announcement to 
>cygwin-announce, and the moderator will handle it from there. Use a 
>recent announcement as a model for the "boilerplate" stuff.

Otherwise send them to me, one per email message, binary and source.  I want
to make sure that the installation "conforms" to our loose standards.

Until I set up some kind of cgi script for submitting these things, I
think that I would like to be the funnel for these requests for the time
being.  Although any cygwin developer can substitute in a pinch.

I'll still be email active for 24 hours or so, so if you send me this info
soon, I'll get this on sourceware.

Unfortunately, I have been the only email moderator for cygwin-announce.
I've just given Corinna this awesome power, though.  I hope that she is
ready for this ponderous responsibility.

If you send this to me and don't see any activity for a while, that
means I'm probably gone to the sunny shores of Cape Cod for two weeks.
So, feel free to send it to any cygwin developer who volunteers.

>As far as composition, some contributors are fairly sparse, leaving 
>documentation to the README files; others (like me) prefer to put lots 
>of info in the announcement to cut down on mailing list traffic from 
>those who will read the ann. but not the README.  (I think "my side" has 
>been winning points lately vis a vis the "cron" package...)

Or, like me, you could be sparse in both the announcement and the REAME...

cgf