Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 22:16:04 +0400 From: egor duda X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.45) Personal Reply-To: egor duda Organization: deo X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <97526857290.20010420221604@logos-m.ru> To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: GCC -mno-cygwin vs mingw32-gcc cross environment. In-reply-To: <3AE07A27.3AAC7BE5@yahoo.com> References: <3AE07A27 DOT 3AAC7BE5 AT yahoo DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi! Friday, 20 April, 2001 Earnie Boyd earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com wrote: EB> I've just successfully completed building a Cygwin native cross build EB> environment for --target=mingw32. While I'm cleaning up the code EB> modifications I would like to ask if we should consider deprecating the EB> -mno-cygwin switch in favor of the cross environment? EB> I would rather see the cross build environment become standard because EB> it is a natural for autoconfiguration. You just add --host=mingw32 to EB> the configuration scripts instead of needing to do CC='gcc -mno-cygwin' EB> configure ... . EB> Comments? -mno-cygwin is currently used when building parts of cygwin itself. we must be dealing with it somehow. i don't think we should deprecate -mno-cygwin (i believe it's quite handy sometimes) but rather discourage using it when it's natural to configure with --host=mingw32 Egor. mailto:deo AT logos-m DOT ru ICQ 5165414 FidoNet 2:5020/496.19