Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 22:05:14 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: w32api release roll out Message-ID: <20010411220514.A31650@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: <3AD5074F DOT 268B8FD7 AT yahoo DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <3AD5074F.268B8FD7@yahoo.com>; from earnie_boyd@yahoo.com on Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 09:39:27PM -0400 On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 09:39:27PM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote: >When can I expect to see this? You had asked earlier if I wanted a >shell login so that I can make the release, the answer is now yes. I am sorry that I haven't responded sooner. I am concerned that if we release a new version of w32api we may break existing software since I believe that there may be a change between newlib and w32api. This won't be an issue if we release everything all together because newlib and w32api will be in sync. The reason that I haven't responded is that I keep meaning to check my email notes and see if I can figure out why I have this suspicion and I haven't been able to do this. So, I would prefer to just release cygwin/mingw/w32api at the same time. Probably that will happen this weekend. If this is really urgent, I can make a test release available and then if no one squawks I can remove the test distinction. cgf