Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <01dd01c0b659$d5898d00$9865fea9@edward> From: "edward" To: "Robert Collins" Cc: References: Subject: Re: pthreads support Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 20:04:10 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Apparently-From: Swiftnsavv AT aol DOT com great effort on pthreads robert. i hope to check out the features this weekend. cheers, edward ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Collins" To: Cc: ; Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 2:47 AM Subject: pthreads support Firstly I hope no-one gets annoyed at the cross post - but I know that not everyone on cygwin/xfree us on cygwin.com and vice versa. I believe the same goes for cygwin-apps.... I'm very interested in fixing what I consider a problem: People attempting to use non-cygwin threads support with cygwin1.dll linked applications. As such I'm hereby solicting bug reports (with _small_ test cases) for the pthreads support in cygwin. I'm making no promises about actually fixing anything or time frames - My paid work and personal life do come before cygwin (shock & horror). Notwithstanding that, I have recently fixed a chunk of functionality in cygwin for another opensource project I hack on (squid) and it's pthread based asynchronous disk module runs quite happily. So if you're an application porter, and pthreads doesn't work for you - contact me on the appropriate cygwin list (cygwin-apps unless it's xfree86 related, in which case cygwin-xfree, or cygwin-developers if you are trying to use pthread support within cygwin1.dll and it's broken). Chris: I hope I'm not stepping across a line here ... but no-one seems to have current "ownership" of pthreads, and I'd like to see cygwin actually get fixed rather than a plethora of workarounds created.. Rob