Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 01:15:25 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Anyone have any problems with external archives of this list?
Message-ID: <20001205011525.A8958@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20001205002708 DOT A17303 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <20001205002708.A17303@redhat.com>; from cgf@redhat.com on Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 12:27:08AM -0500
Note-from-DJ: This may be spam

On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 12:27:08AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>I've just received a few requests from someone who apparently wants to
>archive this list at theaimsgroup.com.
>
>I've turned down a similar request for cygwin-developers but I was
>wondering if anyone had any objections to archiving this list
>externally.
>
>I've actually been thinking that cygwin-apps probably shouldn't be
>per-approval anyway, so I'm not as concerned with potentially opening
>an external gateway here as I am for cygwin-developers.
>
>So, are there any objections to allowing an archiving subscription?

Btw, I just noticed that all of our email addresses are being stored
without any munging in these archives.  I wonder if this accounts for
the incredible amount of spam that I receive at cgf AT cygnus DOT com.

cgf