Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2000 21:07:26 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: FAQ entry? (Was: Texinfo-4.0) Message-ID: <20001123210726.A18786@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: <3A1C3784 DOT 9DEF7B94 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20001122163225 DOT B11387 AT redhat DOT com> <585-Wed22Nov2000234324+0000-starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk> <3A1C79BB DOT 6F1DEA77 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <1053-Thu23Nov2000130050+0000-starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk> <3A1D4454 DOT C9EE8EE5 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <3A1D4454.C9EE8EE5@ece.gatech.edu>; from cwilson@ece.gatech.edu on Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 11:22:44AM -0500 On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 11:22:44AM -0500, Charles S. Wilson wrote: >David Starks-Browning wrote: >> Chuck, >> >> Thanks. I haven't scrutinized it, but my first impression is that >> this is too much for a FAQ entry. It seems to me that a separate web >> page, just for package maintainers, would be more appropriate for >> this. (I don't mean private to package maintainers, just topical.) >> >[ snip ] >> >> If nothing else, the current FAQ could provide URL's to messages like >> Chuck's. > >Sounds reasonable to me. Me too. Are you willing to set this up as a web page, David? It should probably be referenced under "Contributing". cgf