Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 17:33:32 -0400
From: Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
To: Michael Ring <michael-ring AT t-online DOT de>
Cc: cygwin-apps AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject: Re: vim-5.7-2 (Bugfix-version) available for testing
Message-ID: <20000710173332.B18443@cygnus.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Michael Ring <michael-ring AT t-online DOT de>,
	cygwin-apps AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
References: <eec7msgntnbbbmf1okmqp9rvg9taigghl7 AT 4ax DOT com> <20000705182408 DOT D4211 AT cygnus DOT com> <39644EBC DOT 14C8CF9A AT cygnus DOT com> <79djms8bli4jn2cvbjpn3hu0siap1bua9n AT 4ax DOT com> <20000710112951 DOT A29646 AT cygnus DOT com> <9ctjmso3q277qeuoe1vimms00clp3lm3li AT 4ax DOT com> <20000710124155 DOT A7947 AT cygnus DOT com> <ujvjmson51e1orii2bea06it7hv6a71pkc AT 4ax DOT com> <20000710140049 DOT A15648 AT cygnus DOT com> <51bkmsk8u1v1matq2sjrchvmtmih161cao AT 4ax DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i
In-Reply-To: <51bkmsk8u1v1matq2sjrchvmtmih161cao@4ax.com>; from michael-ring@t-online.de on Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 11:12:18PM +0200

On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 11:12:18PM +0200, Michael Ring wrote:
>I will prepare the new package and put it in LATEST.

If you do this, the ".vimrc gets read as a binary file" problem
won't be solved until cygwin 1.1.3 is released, though, right?

Maybe we should just hold off as you have previously suggested.

I was just responding to the part of your email that indicated
that you were having problems with the newest libcygwin.a and
older DLLs.  I didn't mean to imply that we should release an
executable now.

I really don't have much of an opinion on that one way or the other.

cgf