www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: geda-user/2019/02/13/03:21:45

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 09:12:22 +0100 (CET)
To: "Bert Timmerman (bert DOT timmerman AT xs4all DOT nl) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
X-Debug: to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu"
From: gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu
Subject: Re: [geda-user] pcb-rnd is no longer on geda mailing lists
In-Reply-To: <5C63C909.9070307@xs4all.nl>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1902130848110.21900@igor2priv>
References: <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1902130410000 DOT 21900 AT igor2priv> <5C63C909 DOT 9070307 AT xs4all DOT nl>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com

Hello Bert,

On Wed, 13 Feb 2019, Bert Timmerman (bert DOT timmerman AT xs4all DOT nl) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:

Thanks for all the good wishes, the same to you! 

I am trying to focus on the specific statemens/questions below.

> I have learned from that period that pcb users are using and not developing,
> sometimes contributing a (large) patch or bug report, which are most welcome.

The pcb-rnd community is a bit different, probably more active: we have a 
core power-use plus developers group who generate a lot of relevant 
traffic on daily basis. 

This is mostly happening on IRC, so not visible in svn or mailing list 
archives.

>
> I also learned that the decision for a fork was made before it was even
> discussed with me.

The pcb-rnd fork decision was made back in 2013. I was active on the 
mailing list since about 2005 and tried to join coding too. I was 
maintaining pcb-gpmi (the scripting upgrade) since about 2010. I don't 
think the fork was a surprise for anybody back then.

(IIRC you did not lead the pcb project at that time. I didn't have a time 
machine so I didn't know you would, that's how we didn't discuss it before 
the fork.)

Anyway, it doesn't depend on one specific moment (e.g. moment of fork 
decision): there were multiple chances to align pcb-rnd and various 
subprojects of gEDA (including a potential pcb merger back in 2016), but 
it never really worked out. In the same time it was super easy to build 
working cooperation with some non-gEDA projects, so I guess it's just some 
fundamental incompatibility. Maybe both in where an EDA suite/ecosystem 
should arrive at long term and what path is leading there. 

So it's better to move on.

> BTW: I noticed an enormous amount of commits have been done in pcb-rnd over the
> last 3 .. 4 years, tens of thousands of them, my compliments to you. I guess
> you may have retired from your day job to be able to do that ?

Not really. I wish I could retire, but that's many many years from now! 
Instead I have an almost normal daytime job, in a conventional small 
company office and 2*40 minutes commute a day.

The tricks are that I spend most of my free time on pcb-rnd and we have a 
real active core team who do a big chunk of the work and we have a system 
where administration costs are low.

About the workshare: very often for a complex bugfix you will see 2..4 
commits I make, but that's like 5% of the work - the 95% of the work was 
done by a fellow pcb-rnd developer or user who figured what exactly 
triggers the bug and crafted perfect minimal test case.

Regards,

Igor2

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019