Message-ID:	<3B4686FB.3C1C7A03@alpha.delta.edu>
Date:	Fri, 06 Jul 2001 23:50:19 -0400
From:	"David Witbrodt" <dawitbro AT alpha DOT delta DOT edu>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en,ja
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Thanks for statfs() rev. 1.6!
References:	<200107050333 DOT FAA14607 AT father DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> <3B4536ED DOT EAC586B2 AT alpha DOT delta DOT edu> <7458-Fri06Jul2001111507+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >   Info source          Free bytes reported
> >   ===========          ===================
> >   C:->Properties       4 095 901 696 bytes
> >   Scandisk             4 095 901 696 bytes
> >
> >   statfs()             4 026 531 840 bytes
> >
> >   The discrepancy is 69 369 856 bytes, and I don't claim to have a
> > clue as to which figure is correct.
> 
> What's the size of the Windows swap file (assuming it is on that
> partition)?
> 
> Also, does ScanDisk say anything about bad blocks?

  I have custom settings (under Control Panel => System => Performance
=> Virtual Memory) with a minimum swap file space of 320 Mb.
  Scandisk does not report any bad blocks.

  Sorry for the late response.  I use my parents' computer, and
sometimes it is a long time before I can get back to that particular
machine.
  If you would like me to check anything else, just ask!

Thanks,
Dave W.

- Raw text -