Date:	Tue, 3 Aug 1999 09:56:48 -0400
Message-Id:	<199908031356.JAA15480@envy.delorie.com>
From:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To:	eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.990803103541.1847E-100000@is> (message from Eli
	Zaretskii on Tue, 3 Aug 1999 10:36:30 +0300 (IDT))
Subject:	Re: __stub_foo macros in header files
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 990803103541 DOT 1847E-100000 AT is>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Hmmm... kill() works, there just never is another program suitable for
tail to monitor.  Wouldn't tail just print "no such process" or
something?  Since we don't have a ps, how would they guess pids
anyway?  To me, I'd say it was supported but useless, and I wouldn't
do anything special to it.

As for the __stub hack, I think it's a hack and I'd rather avoid
adding hacks to djgpp's headers.

- Raw text -