Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Gary R. Van Sickle" <g DOT r DOT vansickle AT worldnet DOT att DOT net>
To:	<cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: quandary with pthreads
Date:	Wed, 11 Dec 2002 23:53:03 -0600
Message-ID:	<NCBBIHCHBLCMLBLOBONKCEHCDJAA.g.r.vansickle@worldnet.att.net>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.WNT.4.44.0212110941590.294-300000@algeria.intern.net>
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Importance:	Normal

[snip]
> I have created assembler versions for the Interlocked functions that work
> fine unless they are made inline (see attachment). Maybe someone with a
> better understanding of gcc inline assembler might have a look at it).
>

I may have the painfully-acquired honor of fitting that description.  How were
you trying to inline them?  Essentially as-is?  If so, I just may be able to
help.

> Nevertheless adding these functions will drop support for the good old
> i386.

A wise man once said, "The good old days weren't always good/Tomorrow ain't as
bad as it seems".  Nevertheless, I will be the first to be completely
unsurprised when somebody comes looking for B20 when this happens. ;-)

--
Gary R. Van Sickle
Brewer.  Patriot.

- Raw text -