Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Thu, 19 Jul 2001 20:24:53 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: fork on win95
Message-ID:	<20010719202453.C9199@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<EA18B9FA0FE4194AA2B4CDB91F73C0EF08F134 AT itdomain002 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<EA18B9FA0FE4194AA2B4CDB91F73C0EF08F134@itdomain002.itdomain.net.au>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.19i

On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 09:41:34AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>As you've duplicated it I'll skip mailing you data for now - but if you
>do want extra detail let me kknow.

I don't need an strace.  Now that I've duplicated it, the cause is obvious.
It's just not obvious why it ever works for me since it now fails every time.

Maybe, gasp!, I had two different versions of the DLL on my system here.  I
don't normally use my laptop for this kind of testing, so it may have suffered
some bit rot while I wasn't looking.

cgf

- Raw text -