Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin-developers=delorie DOT com AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
From:	Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
Date:	Fri, 19 Nov 1999 13:47:36 -0500
To:	cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject:	cygwin PATH reorg?
Message-ID:	<19991119134736.A17795@cygnus.com>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Mutt 1.0i

Given the number of problems that seem to crop up with people on the
cygwin mailing list, I was wondering if it made sense to have cygwin
probe the path list looking for the directory which is essentially
"/bin" and put this directory first in the PATH.

Finding this directory might be tricky, of course.  Especially if
someone has more than one cygwin installation on their hard disk.
However, we could even issue a warning if no cygwin 'bin' directory
was found.

This could be defeatable by something like CYGWIN=nopathreorg .

Thoughts?

cgf

- Raw text -