Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
From:	Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
Date:	Wed, 16 Jun 1999 10:54:26 -0400
To:	Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Cc:	cygwin developers <cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
Subject:	Re: cygdrive confusing (was Re: new cygwin.dll (was Re: Make problems))
Message-ID:	<19990616105426.C895@cygnus.com>
References:	<19990616115714 DOT 13831 DOT rocketmail AT web116 DOT yahoomail DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Mutt 0.95.3i
In-Reply-To:	<19990616115714.13831.rocketmail@web116.yahoomail.com>; from Earnie Boyd on Wed, Jun 16, 1999 at 04:57:14AM -0700

On Wed, Jun 16, 1999 at 04:57:14AM -0700, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>--- Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com> wrote:
>> I'm not sure why you think this should be empty.  The value of "cygdrive
>> prefix" is used for drives which do not have corresponding mount table
>> entries.  That means if you want to access the foo directory on your q:
>> drive you use:
>> 
>> 	/cygdrive/q/foo
>> 
>
>I see much confusion about this getting ready to happen.  Would it be wise to
>change "cygdrive" to "unmounted" which gives a description of what it's about?

You can do this if you want.  Personally, I like "cygdrive" since that is more
descriptive, and it is not an English word so it is unlikely to be used.

Perhaps if I understood the confusion I would be more amenable to the proposal
but I have to confess that I don't.

cgf

- Raw text -