Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-Id:	<199906142216.RAA18739@mercury.xraylith.wisc.edu>
To:	cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject:	Re: Tonight's snapshot
In-Reply-To:	Your message of "Mon, 14 Jun 1999 19:10:43 EDT."
	<19990614191043 DOT A3693 AT cygnus DOT com>
Date:	Mon, 14 Jun 1999 17:16:21 -0500
From:	Mumit Khan <khan AT xraylith DOT wisc DOT EDU>

Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com> writes:
> 
> I hope that the snapshots are getting close to release quality.
> Please give them a try and let me know.
>

It would be nice if we could get rid of cygwin_non_cygwin_dll_entry AT 12
by next release! However, that will mean breaking binary compat, so 
may not be an option. Failing that, it really needs to be looked at
to make sure we're doing everything needed there right now (ie., init'
ing all the stuff that's needed for a Cygwin DLL loaded by non-cygwin
app/DLL).

Also, some test runs with gcc-2.95 pre-release snapshots will be quite
useful. 

Oh, and if we are breaking binary compat, then we should take the 
opportunity to switch over to using vtable thunks.  

I'm not sure if/when I'll time to do either, so any takers?

Regards,
Mumit

- Raw text -